Global Economy in 2017: Hope and Uncertainty

17/05/2017 06:48  Articles

The calendar year just ended was a slog for the world economy. Weak international trade and subdued investment, among other culprits, conspired to slow world growth to its weakest pace since 2009. And even though the outlook is modestly brighter this new year, unusually heightened uncertainty about policy direction in major economies casts a long shadow over the prospects of recovery.

A quick tour around the world

According to the latest projections by the World Bank, world economic growth is projected to pick up to 2.7 percent in 2017 from a sluggish rate of 2.3 percent last year. Advanced-economy growth is expected to recover moderately to 1.8 percent in 2017. In the United States, manufacturing activity will likely rebound, contributing to a mild pickup in growth. In the Euro Area and Japan, supportive monetary and, to a lesser extent, fiscal policies should help support activity this year.

In emerging and developing economies, growth is projected to accelerate to 4.2 percent in 2017 from 3.4 percent in 2016. With the recovery in commodity prices, particularly oil, the divergence in growth outlooks between commodity exporters and importers is set to narrow.

In China, growth is projected to moderate to 6.5 percent in 2017. This outlook reflects soft external demand, heightened uncertainty about global trade, and slower private investment.

All eyes on the U.S. economy

The new U.S. administration is expected to diverge sharply from the policy path trod by its predecessor. Because developments in the U.S. economy, the world’s largest, have effects far beyond its shores, the changes in policies will likely have substantial global implications.

What, for example, would be the effect of the promised fiscal stimulus? A sizeable package could boost U.S. growth in the near term, with potential knock-on benefits to activity abroad. That said, the full impact of any fiscal stimulus would depend on a host of factors, including its size and composition, the timing of its implementation, the reaction of monetary policy authorities, the amount of slack remaining in the U.S. economy, and the responses of businesses and households. Conversely, if trade policies take a protectionist turn, they could lead to higher import costs and could impact growth.

The new policy path would also have implications for inflation and asset prices. A tightening of U.S. financial conditions – whether due to faster-than-expected U.S. Federal Reserve policy tightening or other reasons – would be felt across global financial markets, and could have adverse effects on emerging and developing economies that rely heavily on external financing.

Until specific proposals are known, it is difficult to comprehensively assess the overall impact of these policy changes on U.S. and global activity. But, whatever course the United States eventually charts, a protracted period of uncertainty about economic policy direction by itself would be a drag on global growth and investment.

A Major Challenge: Weak Investment in Emerging and Developing Economies

Another significant concern clouding the outlook is the substantial slowdown in investment growth in emerging market and developing economies in recent years. The numbers tell a stark story: investment growth in these economies has tumbled from 10 percent, on average, in 2010 to about 3.5 percent in 2016.

The weakness in investment has been most pronounced in the largest emerging markets and commodity-exporting emerging and developing economies, but has now spread to the majority of these economies. In fact, investment growth is below its long-term average in the greatest number of countries in last 25 years, except during serious global downturns.

No single cause is to blame. Weak growth prospects, the commodities price bust, subdued foreign direct investment, policy and political uncertainty in major economies, and elevated private debt have all contributed to sap investment growth.  

While not a headline-grabber, the weakness in investment growth can have insidious and corrosive effects. It slows capital deepening, constrains planned urbanization, and limits future growth potential. Since output growth is a confirmed dynamo of poverty reduction, setbacks to investment growth are a peril to achieving global goals of poverty eradication.

China is deeply integrated into the world economy. Its imports account for one-tenth of global imports, its output makes up one-tenth of the global total, and its investment accounts for one-fifth of world investment. A policy-driven economic rebalancing toward a more sustainable growth model has been underway for several years. In the process, investment growth in China slowed from 21 percent in 2012 to 10 percent in 2015. The slowdown has been most pronounced in the private sector.

Policy Resolutions for the New Year?

Add to the list of threats to the fragile recovery the concern that the elevated level of policy uncertainty may be amplified by mounting protectionist tendencies, weaker potential growth, and financial vulnerabilities in some emerging market economies.

In this challenging environment, both cyclical and structural policies have critical roles to play. In advanced economies, low or even negative real equilibrium interest rates handcuff monetary policy and may warrant more supportive fiscal policies. Emerging and developing economies should find an appropriate balance between fiscal adjustment and policy measures to reduce vulnerabilities.

If policymakers were of a mind to make New Year’s resolutions, they might have chosen an obvious one: find ways to spur sustained growth. Useful policy initiatives include increasing investment in human capital and infrastructure; promoting trade; and fostering an environment that maximizes the benefits of foreign direct investment and technological transfer.

Sticking to that resolution would appear to be the brightest hope for ringing in a new era of stronger growth in 2017.

Ayhan Kose, Director of the World Bank Group’s Development Prospects Group

Share:


Supported By